free web hosting | free hosting | Business Web Hosting | Free Website Submission | shopping cart | php hosting
sept 11th pics

The "POD"

Boeing Buldge flight 175 WTC 9/11


the pod flight 175 WTC 9/11



flight 175 fake plane photo



This is seen exiting the building just after the second plane hit the tower. An engine?
Doesnt look like one to me? What is it?

tower missile

tower missile plane

tower missile large 911 wtc


Point of impact through various filters...
These are framed out from the video found at www.letroll911.org and\ thewebfairy.com/911/index.htm

wtc plane flash attack wtc plane flash2

wtc plane flash towers Pavel closeup photo plane 175 wtc

wtc closeup plane

wtc plane sept 11 tower

wtc closeup plane sept 11

wtc tower closeup plane4

wtc tower plane5 wtc closeup plane6


Related site showing enhanced images of the "POD"
pod.batcave.net/appoach.html


New news from the anomaly on flight 175
www.amics21.com/911/flight175/dud.html
www.amics21.com/911/flight175/rebuttals.html

After reviewing the video from
www.letsroll911.org JackBlood.com has analyzed the flash emitted by the tip of the ‘pod’ located below the airliner. Webmaster Mario Andrade, a Gulf War veteran an explosive ordinance specialist, has noticed remarkable similarities between the ‘pod’ and a military-type general purpose (GP) bomb, such as the commonly used Mark 84 (MK-84).
http://www.jackblood.com/index/id31.html


letsroll911.orghas posed the possibility that it was a KC767 tanker?
http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/kc767/
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewforum.php?f=1
are the 2 objects in green on this photo, related to the objects circled in black here ?

911 photo flight 175



September 11 - US Government accused

A Portugal-based investigative journalist has presented THE NEWS with version of the September 11th attacks that has to date failed to attract the attention of the international press. The report, compiled by an independent inquiry into the September 11th, World Trade Centre attack, warns the American public that the government’s official version of events does not stand up to scrutiny.

A group of military and civilian US pilots, under the chairmanship of Colonel Donn de Grand, after deliberating non-stop for 72 hours, has concluded that the flight crews of the four passenger airliners, involved in the September 11th tragedy, had no control over their aircraft

the-news.net


Boeing has not clarified the enigma of the second plane
9/11 federal investigation held back by White House attitude
The aeronautical company has been asked hundreds of questions about the terrorist attack


EDUARDO MARTÍN DE POZUELO
XAVIER MAS DE XAXÀS

13 July, 2003


Nearly two years have passed since 9/11, but practically no details are known about the biggest attack in history against the United States. The federal commission investigating the breakdown in security which led to the attacks in Washington and New York is openly complaining, not only about the lack of resources, but also of being intimidated by the White House and hence prevented from getting to the truth. This lack of transparency has led "The New York Times" this week to compare the Bush Administration to the Kremlin during Soviet times.

The official version continues to be that a group of 19 terrorists, led by Mohammed Atta, a member of al-Qaida, were able to hijack four commercial airplanes, crashing two into the Twin Towers, one into the Pentagon and causing another to accidentally crash in woodland in Pennsylvania on its way to Washington. The life histories of the terrorists in the months leading up to the attacks are public knowledge and well documented, but there is practically nothing on the investigations prior to or after on the part of the American security agencies, on the daily reports that the CIA prepares for the President, or on the National Security Council meetings. Neither is it known what the relations between these agencies were. The federal commission, which must complete its work by May next year, accuses the Pentagon and the Justice Department (on which the FBI depends) of refusing to provide vital information and of placing a monitor in all interviews to intimidate the witnesses.

These obstacles are preventing, among other information, light being shed on the possible manipulation of the fuselage of the aircraft which struck the south tower of the World Trade Center, reported by this newspaper in our 22 June edition. When La Vanguardia asked Boeing's head office in Seattle about the strange forms to be seen in the photographs, the company spokesperson offered to cooperate fully in clarifying the matter. However, after studying them for several days, Boeing (whose engineers are taking part in the official investigation) declined to give an opinion citing reasons of national security.

Two of the shots inspected by Boeing's engineers (sent to Seattle via Internet as the company had agreed) are lateral views of the last few seconds of the flight. In acknowledging receipt, the spokesperson said they would answer the query and explained that since the attack they had received hundreds of inquiries from all over the world on various aspects of the attack. The majority of queries, they said, were about the Boeing which crashed into the Pentagon, the existence of which has been refuted by a French researcher, the author of several best-sellers on the issue. In this case Boeing stated firmly and without hesitation that the object that struck the famous military building was one of its aircraft. However Boeing has not shown such adamance on the reiterated occasions that La Vanguardia has requested a reasonable explanation for the patches which appear on the aircraft that hit the south tower of the World Trade Center in New York.

The frames in question have been the object of a digital contour-detection analysis carried out at the Escola Universitària Politècnica de Mataró. The study determined that what can be seen on the aircraft are shapes and volumes and not reflections, which could suggest that the craft was carrying some unknown device at the time of impact, the nature of which obviously takes us into the realm of hypotheses. One possibility is that, despite the analyses, the shapes in question are due to an optical phenomenon. Another is that the terrorists attached something to the aircraft to increase its destructive effect. The notable lack of security at Boston's Logan airport, where the two Boeings that destroyed the towers took off, strengthens that possibility. Manipulation of the fuselage, however, would have meant more terrorists taking part than have been detected. The hypothesis that the al-Qaida kamikazes had more help on the ground was put forward by terrorism experts on 11 September itself, but it has never been proved.

Boeing has not clarified the enigma of the second plane
www.amics21.com/911/enigma.html
www.amics21.com/911/

News from "the Pod"
What really hit the South Tower. Was it a plane from the terror drills?

Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy (scroll down 1/3 page)

911review Wtc2PlanePod
911review TwinTowers


Ghost Gun UA175 Were some of the photos and videos from 911 fake ?
This is a very well done presentation, and well worth the reading.
It makes one wonder who and why someone would go through the trouble
of faking media surrounding September 11th ?


investigate911missle.batcave.net

wtc1.0catch.com

letsroll911!!!
letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=3

WTC flight 175 planebomb photos

Team 8 + News

several views (and analysis) of the second hit in flash format
thewebfairy.com/911/insane/index.htm
other links...
www.globalresearch.ca :: View topic - Pictures examined
theparanormal.net

homepage WTC 911 theories, plane photos, and video analysis
mirror The Nautilus Institute: The Matrix of Deterrence


Your Ad Here